Machiavelli vs. Scherer

That fine line between the end justifying the means and the means not justifying the beginning. πŸ™‚

Or is that more like a fine line to the left and right of the means not justifying the beginning and the end justifying the means?

Or is it perhaps more like two fine lines, one to the left and one to the right (but not one in between) the end justifying the means and the means not justifying the middle (but not the one in between again) and the beginning not justifying the end? LOL!

πŸ™‚ Insert Smiley Face

Many high-minded types, not like bishops and saints, might call this moral immoral philosophy.

Many high-minded types, not like bishops and saints, might not call this moral immoral philosophy, aka immoral moral philosophy.

But many high-minded types, like bishops and saints, would claim that this wasn’t moral philosophy at all. It was devil talk.

Babbling again

<babbles>

I think I would rather know I have something that I never need than not know I have something I need. Or, put a bit less succinctly, the idea of needing something that I already have scares me more than the thought of having something I never needed.

There is a thin line between the thought/idea of needing something that you already have and the idea/thought of having something you never needed, although the later is probably way more common. πŸ™‚

</babbles>

1 13 14 15 16 17 35